EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Application of TOPSIS for world ranking of institutions/universities

Prem Vrat

Journal of Advances in Management Research, 2025, vol. 23, issue 1, 47-63

Abstract: PurposeThe QS World ranking framework is a globally renowned ranking framework that ranks institutions globally as well as on a regional basis. This research aims to examine an alternative methodology for obtaining world rankings. This ranking is very popular, yet the research presents a case to have a re-look on the methodology used in the ranking.Design/methodology/approachThe QS Ranking framework uses a simple additive weighting (SAW) approach to get a total weighted score for each candidate institution, and these are ranked according to descending order of total weighted score. An illustrative example of QS world ranking 2025 of four institutions is taken, and the results are compared with ranks obtained using the SAW methodology implicitly employed by the QS ranking framework. In our research, a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method, TOPSIS, is employed to rank and compare institutions with the QS ranking.FindingsIn the QS World University Ranking 2025, RWTH scores 59.9 with a rank of 99. The University of Copenhagen, Denmark, scores 59.6 with a rank of 100; IIT Bombay scores 56.6 and IIT Delhi 52.1. These ranks are interchanged with subtractive differences in the TOPSIS Score of 0.6350 for Copenhagen University and 0.4617 for RWTH and remain unchanged for IIT Bombay and IIT Delhi.Research limitations/implicationsThis paper adopted a small dataset of four universities/institutions to test the alternative methodology that appears intuitively appealing to derive meaningful inferences. However, this paper does not comment on the basic structure of the QS ranking system, giving large weight to academic and employer reputations based on a survey-based approach.Originality/valueThis paper suggested an alternative but well-known MCDM technique (TOPSIS) for ranking world universities rather than the SAW technique implicitly employed by QS.

Keywords: MCDM; TOPSIS; QS world ranking (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.emerald.com/jamr/article/23/1/47/12534 ... for-world-ranking-of (text/html)
https://www.emerald.com/jamr/article-pdf/23/1/47/1 ... r-11-2024-0426en.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eme:jamrpp:jamr-11-2024-0426

DOI: 10.1108/JAMR-11-2024-0426

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Advances in Management Research is currently edited by Prof Ravi Shankar and Prof Surendra Yadav

More articles in Journal of Advances in Management Research from Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Emerald Support ().

 
Page updated 2026-11-04
Handle: RePEc:eme:jamrpp:jamr-11-2024-0426