Operationalizing AACSB’s societal impact standard: assessing SDG 8 integration through a community partner internship program

Pamella Howell, Arun Aryal and Charleata Battle

Journal of Business and Socio-economic Development, 2025, vol. 5, issue 4, 315-337

Abstract: PurposeAlthough the revised AACSB’s Standard 9 provides a strategic direction, limited research has been conducted on operationalizing its integration into business schools. To address this gap, we defined and evaluated a framework to explicate societal impact through specific inputs, activities, outputs and outcomes at the organizational, student and faculty levels.Design/methodology/approachThe study used a mixed-method approach. The data include quantitative and qualitative survey responses from nonprofit executives, which were analyzed using hypothesis testing. The qualitative responses from students were analyzed using natural language processing (NLP), and faculty evaluations used a standardized rubric.FindingsThe adopted model used in this research effectively measured the societal impact of Sustainable development goal (SDG) 8. Three key findings include: (1) Nonprofit executives reported contributions to their project success rate and enhanced decision-making processes. (2) The evaluation of student perceptions showed growth in career readiness competencies. (3) Faculty assessments indicated strengthened connections between academic preparation and workforce development with SDG 8 goals. The operationalization of activities and outputs within the internship program provided a framework for evaluating organizational and individual career development outcomes.Research limitations/implicationsThis methodology has limitations: it does not account for other factors that may influence participants’ responses. This analysis focuses on determining whether the executive’s viewpoint deviates significantly from a neutral stance without considering the effects of additional variables. Another limitation is the sample size. Research on small sample sizes has demonstrated that the Type I error rate is close to the 5% nominal value in most cases (De Winter, 2019).Practical implicationsOur findings offer significant implications for AACSB accreditation by providing a practical framework for operationalizing SDG 8, which is used across many currently accredited universities. The paper can be used as supplementary information for AACSB interpretive guidance. This perspective can influence how AACSB evaluates and supports business education programs aimed at providing broader views of program effectiveness and AACSB accreditation of business schools. Future research could focus on providing schools with a comprehensive assessment tool kit for universities seeking accreditation.Social implicationsOur program can have a national or international appeal. If it can be successfully implemented across multiple universities, federal/state/local municipalities can collaborate with nonprofit organizations to pair with public business schools to achieve the SDGs. Additionally, the government may consider policies requiring organizations that receive loans/funding/support to partner with business schools to bolster participation. This model could serve as a structural architecture for addressing other societal challenges beyond SDG 8, potentially simultaneously evaluating multiple SDGs that affect constituents locally and globally.Originality/valueThis research demonstrates a novel framework for operationalizing AACSB’s Standard 9 using SDG 8 in the information systems discipline. This model of implementing data-driven community partner internships can be integrated across business schools nationally and internationally. Our assessment approach provides valuable insights for accreditation bodies, educators, researchers, employers and students on implementing and assessing societal impact initiatives in business education.

Keywords: AACSB; Sustainable development goals (SDGs); Curriculum; Societal impact; Program evaluation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.emerald.com/jbsed/article/5/4/315/1271 ... etal-impact-standard (text/html)
https://www.emerald.com/jbsed/article-pdf/5/4/315/ ... d-02-2025-0023en.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eme:jbsedp:jbsed-02-2025-0023

DOI: 10.1108/JBSED-02-2025-0023

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Business and Socio-economic Development is currently edited by Professor Allam Hamdan

More articles in Journal of Business and Socio-economic Development from Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Emerald Support ().