Review and prospects of rural entrepreneurship research: based on complex adaptive systems theory perspective

Guopeng Xiang and Chao Hu

Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 2025, vol. 19, issue 6, 1705-1720

Abstract: PurposeThis study aims to systematically reveal the core mechanisms of dynamic adaptation and coevolution among the four-dimensional elements – institutions, culture, resources and technology – within the rural entrepreneurial ecosystem, based on complex adaptive systems (CAS) theory.Design/methodology/approachThis study uses the Bibliometric-Systematic Literature Review (B-SLR) framework, integrating the coding logic of grounded theory to systematically synthesize literature retrieval and thematic analysis.FindingsThe study finds that – (1) The institutional opportunity window originates from structural loosening triggered by policy shifts. Its opening and closing efficacy is significantly dynamically moderated by the cultural genes of rural society; (2) Entrepreneurial bricolage, as the core adaptive mechanism, manifests through a triple pathway: institutional bricolage, network bricolage and technological bricolage. Its efficacy is constrained by dual contexts: institutional constraints and cultural constraints; (3) Digital technology significantly enhances the efficiency and scope of resource recombination through “digital bricolage,” while simultaneously reshaping cultural cognition and compelling institutional responses; (4) Rural entrepreneurial outcomes exhibit multidimensional differentiation across economic resilience, social capital and environmental performance; (5) Rural digital transformation faces structural challenges including the digital divide, literacy barriers, compounding resource inequality and insufficient institutional adaptability;(6) The four-dimensional elements (institutions-culture-resources-technology) drive differentiation in entrepreneurial outcomes and system-level emergence through nonlinear interactions. Acting as a key “adaptive medium,” digital technology amplifies institutional dividends, mitigates cultural resistance, enhances bricolage efficacy and propels the system toward a higher-order complex steady state through coevolution.Research limitations/implicationsThe study lacks fine-grained, diachronic tracking of the adaptive cognition iteration, strategy adjustment behaviors and learning-feedback mechanisms of micro-level entrepreneurial agents.Practical implicationsThe findings provide CAS-based governance insights for policymakers: the need to establish culturally sensitive policy evaluation mechanisms and implement flexible institutional design, while promoting the integration of digital technology empowerment and embeddedness in local social networks.Originality/valueThis study originally constructs the “Institutions-Culture-Resources-Technology” four-dimensional nonlinear dynamic interaction model, which transcends traditional unidimensional analytical paradigms.

Keywords: Rural entrepreneurship; Complex adaptive system; Cultural double-edged effect; Entrepreneurial bricolage (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.emerald.com/jec/article/19/6/1705/1271 ... ral-entrepreneurship (text/html)
https://www.emerald.com/jec/article-pdf/19/6/1705/ ... c-11-2024-0233en.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eme:jecpps:jec-11-2024-0233

DOI: 10.1108/JEC-11-2024-0233

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy is currently edited by Prof Leo Dana and Andrea Caputo

More articles in Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy from Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Emerald Support ().