EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Globalization (fighting), corruption and development

Simplice Asongu

Journal of Economic Studies, 2014, vol. 41, issue 3, 346-369

Abstract: Purpose - – Is globalization instrumental in fighting corruption? Do wealth effects matter in this fight? Are findings valid when linearity assumptions are dropped? The purpose of this paper is to assess the Lalountaset al.(2011) hypotheses (conclusions) in the African context. Design/methodology/approach - – Though not form, yet in substance the intuition and motivation are compatible with those of Lalountaset al.(2011). Four hypotheses are tested from different methodological and contextual standpoints. In the analysis, while the economic and social dimensions of globalization are reflected in the human development index, the political dimension is captured by good governance indicators. A two-stage least squares-instrumental variable (TSLS-IV) estimation technique is applied where-in globalization instruments of trade and financial liberalization are instrumented on human development and government quality to account for corruption (corruption-control) effects. Thus the intuition is assessing how globalization is instrumental in the fight against corruption through human development (economic and social dimensions) and government quality (political dimension). Findings - –H1: globalization is a powerful tool in fighting corruption (True).H2: globalization is an important tool in fighting corruption only in middle- and high-income countries (partially true).H3: for low-income countries globalization has no significant impact on corruption (true).H4:H1andH2are valid only under linearity (false). Social implications - – In countries with high levels of per capita, emphasis is placed on the political and social dimensions of globalization and as a result the effects of this phenomenon on corruption-control are significant. Conversely, in nations with low levels of per capita income, emphasis is given to the economic dimension of international integration and as a result the effect of globalization on corruption is limited. As a policy implication, persistent globalization as an effective means to reduce corruption in developing countries might lead to inappropriate policies in low-income countries. Originality/value - – This paper has tested the Lalountaset al.(2011) hypotheses in the continent where concerns of globalization, human development and corruption are most acute.

Keywords: Africa; Corruption; Globalization; Wealth effects (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (165)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (text/html)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eme:jespps:v:41:y:2014:i:3:p:346-369

DOI: 10.1108/JES-04-2012-0048

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Economic Studies is currently edited by Prof Mohsen Bahmani-Oskooee

More articles in Journal of Economic Studies from Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Emerald Support ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-22
Handle: RePEc:eme:jespps:v:41:y:2014:i:3:p:346-369