Explaining the adoption of benefit corporation laws by the US states

Susan M. Murray

Journal of Financial Economic Policy, 2018, vol. 10, issue 3, 351-368

Abstract: Purpose - Over half of the US states have jettisoned an exclusive focus on profit maximization for shareholders and created new corporate structures, called “benefit corporations”, which give equal standing to the achievement of social and environmental objectives. This paper aims to examine the factors leading to adoption of legislation for the business formation of benefit corporations by the US states. Design/methodology/approach - Event History Analysis (EHA), a time-series technique using panel data of non-repeatable events, is used to identify and understand economic, political and diffusion factors that affect the adoption of benefit corporation enabling legislation in the US states. Findings - The results strongly indicate that politics matters – states in which the Democratic Party or liberal ideology controls governmental functions are more likely to pass these laws. There is also evidence that states that are more innovative in their approach to policy-making are more likely to adopt these laws. Otherwise, unemployment, tax burden, political culture, enacted constituency statutes and geographic diffusion have no discernible relationship with the adoption of benefit corporation laws. Practical implications - The paper provides warning signs to firms considering expending costly resources on the establishment of or conversion to benefit corporation status and the related investment in developing skills for the preparation, review and assurance of required annual benefit corporation reporting. Originality/value - The findings suggest future adoption of benefit corporation enabling laws may slow considerably.

Keywords: Social responsibility; Corporate social responsibility; Government policy and regulation; Corporate governance; Corporation and securities law; Policy coordination; Benefit corporations; B-corps; Event history analysis; State policy; Sustainability and accounting (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (text/html)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eme:jfeppp:jfep-09-2017-0085

DOI: 10.1108/JFEP-09-2017-0085

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Financial Economic Policy is currently edited by Prof Franklin Mixon

More articles in Journal of Financial Economic Policy from Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Emerald Support ().