Class action and financial markets: insights from law and economics

Donatella Porrini and Giovanni Ramello

Journal of Financial Economic Policy, 2011, vol. 3, issue 2, 140-160

Abstract: Purpose - Class action (CA) has long been used in practice (mainly in the USA) and studied by academics especially in the shareholder protection area. This paper aims to apply the same practice within the current financial meltdown context. Design/methodology/approach - The paper faces the issue by comparingex anteregulation with anex postregulatory system, basically dependent on the action of the consumer who can sue firms that behave unfairly. The arguments are provided by the law and economics (LE) approach. Findings - According to LE, pure economic loss is a private loss that is not socially relevant but simply implies a redistribution of wealth. Consequently, wrongful behavior that induces reallocation of costs and benefits with no consequences on social welfare is not considered socially harmful, so is not necessarily subject to compensation. Since pure economic loss is very often financial, the above reasoning also applies to financial markets. However, the same LE arguments suggest that in financial markets, the policy of internalizing pure economic loss by means of CAs can be more far‐sighted than simply compensating the victims: the liability system has the particular feature of producing deterrence and driving the market towards an efficient outcome. Originality/value - The paper maintains that CA intended as a complementaryex postregulatory device can play a significant role in addressing a failure thatex anteregulation has not in financial markets. This is coherent with the LE tradition that interprets tort law remedies as a solution for internalizing externalities and providing the correct incentive to the markets.

Keywords: Legal action; Financial markets; Laws and legislation; Torts; United States of America (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (text/html)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
Working Paper: Class action and financial markets: Insights from law and economics (2010)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eme:jfeppp:v:3:y:2011:i:2:p:140-160

DOI: 10.1108/17576381111133615

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Financial Economic Policy is currently edited by Prof Franklin Mixon

More articles in Journal of Financial Economic Policy from Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Emerald Support ().