The relationship between audit components and audit expectation gap in listed companies on the Tehran stock exchange

Mahdi Salehi, Fariba Jahanbin and Mohammad Sadegh Adibian

Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 2020, vol. 18, issue 1, 199-222

Abstract: Purpose - The expectation gap between auditors and users has recently been the topic of many controversies. This paper aims to evaluate the relationship between auditor’s characteristics and audit expectation gap among information users in listed companies on the Tehran stock exchange market. In other words, the study attempts to find whether there is a significant relationship between audit components and the audit expectation gap or not. Design/methodology/approach - The multiple regression model is used to test the hypotheses. Research hypotheses are tested using a sample of 78 listed companies on the Tehran stock exchange during 2012-2016, by using integrated data technique of the multiple regression model. Findings - The findings show that standard audit fees are not significantly associated with the audit expectation gap. Furthermore, audit fees are negatively associated with the audit expectation gap, which provides that allocated audit price in financial statements gives useful information for external and internal individuals. Predictably, it is recommended that audit opinion significantly determines the level of the audit expectation gap. The authors also find that the independence of the director boards and audit committee members fulfill the expectation gap of individual users. Moreover, finding the negative impact of audit firms ranking on the expectation gap, supports the idea of higher ranked audit firms provide high quality services, and consequently, more reliable information. Finally, the results show that the audit record is positively associated with the audit expectation gap. Originality/value - As all recent studies on the expectation gap were qualitative, the present study is the first paper, which measures the expectation gap quantitatively through the statistical method.

Keywords: Audit fees; Board independence; Audit committee independence; Audit expectation gap; Type of audit report; Audit firm ranking; Audit firm record (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (text/html)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eme:jfrapp:jfra-12-2018-0115

DOI: 10.1108/JFRA-12-2018-0115

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting is currently edited by Prof. Aziz Jaafar and Prof Khaled Hussainey

More articles in Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting from Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Emerald Support ().