The EU AML package and its impact on Türkiye
Emriye Özlem Şeker
Journal of Money Laundering Control, 2025, vol. 28, issue 3, 561-571
Abstract:
Purpose - The purpose of this research is to examine the current Turkish legislative framework in the context of the amendments introduced by the EU AML package, to assess the anticipated changes that may be introduced to Türkiye’s regulatory landscape. Design/methodology/approach - The research conducts a comparative analysis of the principal topics covered in the EU AML rules including obliged entities, enhanced due diligence, cash payment limits, beneficial ownership, high-risk countries, FIUs and supervisors. It then compares these topics with the existing AML framework in Türkiye. Findings - The research identifies a broad alignment between the new EU rules and Turkish legislation. However, notable differences exist in the areas such as a single cash limit specific to AML, the registry and related powers governing beneficial ownership and the powers of FIUs and supervisors. Research limitations/implications - The research is limited to the analysis of the primary legislative texts and does not encompass empirical data concerning the implementation and enforcement of these legal instruments. Further research could explore the practical impact of these changes in Türkiye. Practical implications - The findings highlight areas where Turkish legislation may require alignment with new EU AML rules, providing guidance for policymakers and regulatory bodies in Türkiye. Additionally, the research provides valuable insights for AML practitioners by presenting an overview of current Turkish AML legislation. Social implications - Alignment with EU AML rules can enhance Türkiye’s international political standing and reinforce its reputation as a committed partner in the global fight against financial crime. Originality/value - The research offers a comprehensive comparison of Turkish and EU AML frameworks, thereby contributing to the understanding of the legislative alignment process between an EU candidate country and the EU.
Keywords: Anti-money laundering; EU-Türkiye relations; Legislative comparison; Turkey; EU AML package (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (text/html)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eme:jmlcpp:jmlc-08-2024-0129
DOI: 10.1108/JMLC-08-2024-0129
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Money Laundering Control is currently edited by Dr Paul Gilmour
More articles in Journal of Money Laundering Control from Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Emerald Support ().