Protecting whistleblowers at work

David Lewis and Tina Uys

Managerial Law, 2007, vol. 49, issue 3, 76-92

Abstract: Purpose - The paper proposes to compare the relative success of the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 (UK) and the Protected Disclosures Act 2000 (South Africa) in providing protection for whistleblowers in the UK and South Africa. Design/methodology/approach - The assessment is conducted in the light of case law in both countries and empirical research previously conducted. Findings - The most important feature of the relevant statutes in both countries is that they recognise the need to protect workers who disclose in the public interest. Although the current provisions are important first steps, it is believed that much more needs to be done. Practical implications - In the light of this research, 14 suggestions are made for change. Originality/value - The article makes proposals for reform to the legislation in both countries. It also attempts to provide guidance to practitioners by identifying good practice in handling concerns about wrongdoing.

Keywords: Whistleblowing; Legislation; South Africa; United Kingdom (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2007
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (text/html)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eme:mlppss:03090550710816492

DOI: 10.1108/03090550710816492

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Managerial Law from Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Emerald Support ().