Investor reaction to regulated monopolies announcing going concern opinions
Mark Schaub
Review of Accounting and Finance, 2006, vol. 5, issue 4, 393-409
Abstract:
Purpose - This study aims to examine the industry reaction as determined by stock returns when firms in the electric services industry announced receipt of Going concern audit opinions from 1984 through 1991. Design/methodology/approach - The study utilizes standard event study methodology to test for significant excess performance. Findings - From 1984 to 1991, going concern opinion (GCO) announcements produce a contagion response in the industry on the announcement date more than half the time. Also, over the event window of the announcement date plus the five days following, six of the seven announcements were accompanied by significant negative industry reaction. Regression analysis suggests non‐announcing a firm's leverage and earnings correlation with the announcing firm significantly impact abnormal returns, as does the exchange on which the announcer's equity is traded, the size of the announcing firm and whether nuclear plant problems were mentioned in the announcement. Research limitations/implications - The findings suggest that audit opinions provide new information for investors in the electric services industry. Also, GCO announcements in this industry normally result in contagion among rival firms. Originality/value - This paper provides insights into investor reactions to news contained in Going concern audit opinions in the electric services industry.
Keywords: Auditors; Going concern value; Market position; Monopolies (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2006
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (text/html)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eme:rafpps:14757700610712453
DOI: 10.1108/14757700610712453
Access Statistics for this article
Review of Accounting and Finance is currently edited by Nawazish Mirza
More articles in Review of Accounting and Finance from Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Emerald Support ().