EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Audit tenure and earnings surprise management

Li‐Chin Jennifer Ho, Chao‐Shin Liu and Thomas Schaefer

Review of Accounting and Finance, 2010, vol. 9, issue 2, 116-138

Abstract: Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the relation between audit tenure and how clients manage the annual earnings surprise. Design/methodology/approach - A sample of 5,029 firm‐year observations from 1996 to 2003 were employed to examine whether audit tenure is negatively related to the incidence of accrual‐based‐upward earnings management to avoid negative earnings surprises; and whether audit tenure is positively related to the incidence of downward forecast guidance to avoid negative earnings surprises. Findings - Empirical results indicate a substitution of downward forecast guidance for upward earnings management as audit tenure lengthens. Research limitations/implications - The paper provides evidence that, as the auditor‐client relationship lengthens over time, firms turn to downward forecast guidance as a substitute for upward earnings management. One possible limitation of the sample period involves the implementation of the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act (SOX) of 2002. Because of the increased financial reporting scrutiny on both management and auditors that accompanies SOX, it is likely that constraints on earnings misstatements increase after SOX. Any decrease in upward earnings management resulting from SOX would thus work against finding a relation between audit tenure and the substitution of downward forecast guidance to prevent negative earnings surprises. Originality/value - This paper supports the notion that audit tenure affects firms' choices among various tactics in their attempts to avoid negative earnings surprises. The results also contribute to the ongoing debate on mandatory audit firm rotation by showing that audit quality increases with audit tenure.

Keywords: Auditing; Financial forecasting; Organizational earnings (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (text/html)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eme:rafpps:v:9:y:2010:i:2:p:116-138

DOI: 10.1108/14757701011044152

Access Statistics for this article

Review of Accounting and Finance is currently edited by Nawazish Mirza

More articles in Review of Accounting and Finance from Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Emerald Support ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eme:rafpps:v:9:y:2010:i:2:p:116-138