The performance of socially responsible mutual funds: a volatility‐match approach

Javier Rodríguez

Review of Accounting and Finance, 2010, vol. 9, issue 2, 180-188

Abstract: Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the performance of a sample of socially responsible mutual funds (SRMFs) and a matched sample of conventional funds during the 1997‐2005 time period. Design/methodology/approach - Risk‐adjusted performance is examined using several methodologies, including a measure that compares the performance of a fund with that of an efficient and volatility‐match benchmark portfolio. Findings - On the basis of the raw returns, socially responsible funds performed better than some market indexes but this evidence of outperformance disappears once risk is incorporated into the analysis. Consistent with previous studies, no evidence was found of out performance by socially responsible funds. Also, the difference between the performance of SRMFs and conventional mutual funds is not statistically significant. This result is robust to the use of two additional measures of risk‐adjusted performance. Originality/value - To measure risk‐adjusted performance, a measure first introduced by Graham and Harvey was employed. Similar to the Jensen's alpha of a single factor model, the Graham and Harvey measure evaluates fund performance relative to a volatility‐match benchmark but does not depend on a linear model specification and thus is free from the potential biases presented by linear models.

Keywords: Performance appraisal; Unit trusts; Investments; Social responsibility; Financial risk (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (text/html)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eme:rafpps:v:9:y:2010:i:2:p:180-188

DOI: 10.1108/14757701011044189

Access Statistics for this article

Review of Accounting and Finance is currently edited by Nawazish Mirza

More articles in Review of Accounting and Finance from Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Emerald Support ().