Debt of high-income consumers may reflect leverage rather than poor cognitive reflection
Sergio Da Silva,
Newton Da Costa,
Raul Matsushita,
Cristiana Vieira,
Ana Correa and
Dinorá De Faveri
Review of Behavioral Finance, 2018, vol. 10, issue 1, 42-52
Abstract:
Purpose - A recent population-wide study for Germany, where credit lines on current accounts are available to 80 percent of the population, finds that overdraft debt is more likely for people who give intuitive but incorrect answers on a cognitive reflection test. This suggests that those consumers in debt have poorer cognitive reflection and, thus, lack of self-control. The Germany study finds that “surprisingly, the level of income does not play a central role.” The purpose of this paper is to discriminate the consumers in terms of their income by considering two experiments. Design/methodology/approach - In the first (pilot) experiment, the authors do not discriminate consumers in terms of income and, as result, replicate the Germany study. In a follow-up experiment, which assembles a high-quality sample of high-income consumers, the authors find debt can no longer be explained by poor cognitive reflection. Findings - Apparently, high-income consumers treat debt as mere leverage, as companies do. Originality/value - Not all consumer indebtedness can be caused by lack of self-control. High-income consumers are likely to contract debt as leverage. This resembles rational risk taking.
Keywords: Debt; Consumer behaviour; Cognitive reflection; Consumer indebtedness; Overdraft (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (text/html)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
Related works:
Working Paper: Debt of high-income consumers may reflect leverage rather than poor cognitive reflection (2017) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eme:rbfpps:rbf-07-2016-0046
DOI: 10.1108/RBF-07-2016-0046
Access Statistics for this article
Review of Behavioral Finance is currently edited by Professor Gulnur Muradoglu
More articles in Review of Behavioral Finance from Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Emerald Support ().