The liquidity, performance and investor preference of socially responsible investments

Jennifer Brodmann, Phuvadon Wuthisatian and Rama K. Malladi

Review of Behavioral Finance, 2021, vol. 15, issue 2, 224-239

Abstract: Purpose - The purpose of the paper is to analyze socially responsible investment (SRI) asset performance compared to traditional assets using the MSCI KLD 400 Index. The authors examine the required return that investors expect to maintain their holdings in SRI stock and whether SRI stocks can be used for diversification during financial crises. Design/methodology/approach - The authors examine SRI stocks' liquidity from the MSCI KLD 400 index, encompassing all environmental, social and governance (ESG) factor investments over 25 years, from 1990 until 2019. The authors test whether sorting portfolios based on their excess return, liquidity and volatility can explain the difference in SRI and non-SRI stocks' returns and then examine the global financial crisis' (GFC) impact on excess returns for SRI and non-SRI assets. Findings - The authors find a significant difference in liquidity and volatility between SRI and non-SRI stocks and that SRI stocks perform better during financial crises. The results suggest a possible general investor preference to invest in non-SRI stocks despite our findings that SRI stocks tend to withstand financial risk better than non-SRI stocks. The authors find that long-term investors may be willing to forego short-term gains to reduce their overall risk exposure during crises. Originality/value - SRI is gaining international popularity as an alternative investment that includes ratings based on ESG factors. Previous studies provide mixed results of whether SRI stocks outperform conventional stocks. In addition, there is limited research examining the liquidity and volatility of SRI assets. The authors compare the differences between SRI and non-SRI stocks in terms of excess return, volatility and liquidity and compare the liquidity of SRI and non-SRI stocks during the financial crisis.

Keywords: Socially responsible investment; KLD rating; Investor preference; Sustainable investment; G10; G11; G12 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (text/html)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eme:rbfpps:rbf-09-2021-0191

DOI: 10.1108/RBF-09-2021-0191

Access Statistics for this article

Review of Behavioral Finance is currently edited by Professor Gulnur Muradoglu

More articles in Review of Behavioral Finance from Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Emerald Support ().