Tracking governance and SDG progress in Africa: falling behind or leading the way?

Prince Gyimah, Kingsley Opoku Appiah and Kwadjo Appiagyei

Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 2026, vol. 17, issue 6, 1790-1817

Abstract: PurposeThis study aims to examine whether Africa is falling behind or leading the way in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by analyzing how governance capacity is associated with SDG performance across African regions. Drawing on Governance Network Theory (GNT), the study moves beyond general claims that governance matters to examine how governance–SDG relationships vary across goals and territorial contexts.Design/methodology/approachThe study uses a quantitative panel data design covering 46 African countries from 2015 to 2022. SDG performance is measured using the Sustainable Development Report index and SDG trend scores. Governance capacity is proxied by the Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI) and analyzed using pooled panel regressions and ordered probit models with regional interaction effects to capture heterogeneity across African subregions. Because cross-country data do not allow direct observation of governance networks, the WGI dimensions are interpreted as network-enabling governance capacities, and the results are interpreted through a GNT lens rather than as direct measures of network structure.FindingsThe results show that governance capacity is positively associated with overall SDG performance, but the strength of this association varies significantly across SDGs and regions. Governance effects are strongest for coordination-intensive goals, notably quality education (SDG 4), gender equality (SDG 5), climate action (SDG 13) and partnerships for the goals (SDG 17). Persistent underperformance is observed in poverty (SDG 1), health (SDG 3) and inequality (SDG 10)-related goals, highlighting governance–performance decoupling in some regions.Practical implicationsThe findings suggest that SDG strategies in Africa should prioritize strengthening coordination capacity, multi-actor collaboration and regional governance networks, rather than relying on uniform governance reforms. Regionally tailored action maps can enhance SDG delivery effectiveness.Social implicationsBy identifying where and why governance capacity translates unevenly into SDG outcomes, the study informs policymakers, development partners and civil society actors seeking inclusive and context-sensitive pathways to sustainable development in Africa.Originality/valueThe study advances SDG research by operationalizing GNT in a multi-regional African context by showing that governance–SDG relationships in Africa are conditional, regionally embedded and goal-specific, rather than uniformly positive.

Keywords: Governance; Sustainability; Sustainable development goals; Governance network theory; Africa; Ordered probit (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.emerald.com/sampj/article/17/6/1790/13 ... G-progress-in-Africa (text/html)
https://www.emerald.com/sampj/article-pdf/17/6/179 ... j-10-2024-1186en.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eme:sampjp:sampj-10-2024-1186

DOI: 10.1108/SAMPJ-10-2024-1186

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal is currently edited by Prof Carol Adams

More articles in Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal from Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Emerald Support ().