Sustainability assurance landscape after the CSRD: scenario analysis and evolutionary pathways in Europe

Agnese Sabbatucci, Michele Guidi and Marco Giuliani

Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 2026, vol. 17, issue 3, 984-1011

Abstract: PurposeThis study aims to examine how the evolving European Union (EU) sustainability regulatory landscape, shaped by the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and recent developments such as the Stop the Clock Directive and the Omnibus I Package, and embodying differing political, economic and institutional interpretations of sustainability, may influence the future configuration of the sustainability assurance market for both mandatory and voluntary adopters.Design/methodology/approachThe paper adopts a scenario analysis approach, supported by an inductive content analysis of legislative texts related to CSRD transposition and the Omnibus I Package. Key variables, including the scope of authorised providers, the role of incumbent auditors, professional qualifications and training requirements, guide the construction of alternative scenarios.FindingsFor mandatory adopters, the analysis outlines three possible trajectories for the sustainability assurance market: (1) a monopoly of statutory auditors, (2) competitive coexistence between statutory auditors and independent assurance service providers and (3) thematic specialisation between financial and sustainability auditors. For voluntary adopters, the analysis adds (4), a fragmented and largely optional assurance market shaped by the Omnibus I framework.Practical implicationsThe scenarios identify actionable regulatory levers that policymakers and oversight bodies can use to mitigate fragmentation risks and safeguard assurance quality under both mandatory and voluntary regimes.Social implicationsBy clarifying how regulatory recalibration may affect sustainability assurance practices, the study informs stakeholders who rely on sustainability reports for accountability and decision-making.Originality/valueThis study presents a novel approach by employing scenario analysis to link the diversity of CSRD implementation with potential assurance market outcomes. By connecting expected divergence in CSRD transposition to broad political and sustainability dynamics within the EU, the study demonstrates how competing policy directions and differing emphases on the economic, social and environmental pillars shape the emerging assurance market.

Keywords: Sustainability reporting; Sustainability assurance; European Union (EU); Corporate sustainability reporting directive (CSRD); European sustainability reporting standard (ESRS); Omnibus package (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.emerald.com/sampj/article/17/3/984/134 ... scape-after-the-CSRD (text/html)
https://www.emerald.com/sampj/article-pdf/17/3/984 ... j-12-2024-1393en.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eme:sampjp:sampj-12-2024-1393

DOI: 10.1108/SAMPJ-12-2024-1393

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal is currently edited by Prof Carol Adams

More articles in Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal from Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Emerald Support ().