Corporate responsibility in the age of artificial intelligence: a novel perspective and actionable solutions

Reza Vaezi

Social Responsibility Journal, 2025, vol. 22, issue 3, 617-633

Abstract: PurposeThis study aims to examine the evolving nature of corporate responsibility in the era of artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled technologies and challenges the applicability of traditional accountability frameworks to autonomous and interactive technologies.Design/methodology/approachUsing a conceptual and interdisciplinary approach, this paper synthesizes insights from information systems, philosophy and business strategy. It introduces a theoretical model explaining how AI training objectives influence user ambivalence, corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance.FindingsThis study reveals that AI systems, which actively shape user experiences, are influenced by business strategies designed to maximize user engagement. This often contributes to adverse outcomes such as addiction and psychological discomfort. This paper proposes that amending AI objectives to prioritize user well-being can reduce user ambivalence and increase platform adoption and loyalty, benefiting both users and corporations.Research limitations/implicationsAs a conceptual paper, empirical validation of the proposed framework is needed. Future research should focus on operationalizing user well-being metrics and testing the model in real-world settings through collaboration with technology firms.Practical implicationsTechnology providers can enhance both user retention and profitability by aligning AI systems with users’ well-being, positioning themselves as socially responsible entities.Social implicationsThis paper calls for a paradigm shift in how responsibility is distributed in human–AI interactions, urging greater corporate accountability to protect users’ well-being in digital environments.Originality/valueThis work is novel in its philosophical challenge to the traditional logic of toolmaker nonliability and in proposing a dual-benefit solution that integrates ethical AI design with strategic business alignment, without requiring radical business model changes.

Keywords: AI responsibility; Corporate social responsibility; Ambivalence; AI adoption (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.emerald.com/srj/article/22/3/617/13237 ... he-age-of-artificial (text/html)
https://www.emerald.com/srj/article-pdf/22/3/617/10966742/srj-05-2025-0507en.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eme:srjpps:srj-05-2025-0507

DOI: 10.1108/SRJ-05-2025-0507

Access Statistics for this article

Social Responsibility Journal is currently edited by Prof David Crowther

More articles in Social Responsibility Journal from Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Emerald Support ().