Principled resilience in NGOs: a values-driven conceptual framework for sustaining mission integrity amid paradox and uncertainty

Erhan Atay

Social Responsibility Journal, 2026, 1-20

Abstract: PurposeThis conceptual paper aims to develop the notion of principled resilience – a values-driven framework explaining how non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and mission-oriented organizations sustain mission integrity, legitimacy and ethical consistency amid financial constraint, accountability pressure and organizational paradox. It addresses the limits of performance-centric resilience models by reframing resilience as a responsibility-oriented capability rather than a reactive response to disruption.Design/methodology/approachThe paper conceptually integrates paradox theory and resilience-as-practice to build a values-anchored model of responsible organizational adaptation. It identifies three interdependent capacities – mission fidelity, process orientation and outcome independence – that collectively define principled resilience as both an ethical and adaptive system for sustaining legitimacy in uncertain environments.FindingsPrincipled resilience explains how organizations navigate tensions between short-term accountability demands and long-term social commitments. It shows that true resilience emerges not merely from adaptive capacity but from embedding responsibility, reflection and value coherence into governance, decision-making and stakeholder engagement practices.Research limitations/implicationsAs a conceptual study, the framework requires empirical validation. Future research could examine its propositions across diverse institutional and cultural contexts, assessing how mission fidelity, process orientation and outcome independence jointly influence legitimacy, stakeholder trust and societal outcomes.Practical implicationsThe framework equips leaders, donors and policymakers with tools to institutionalize responsibility and moral integrity within governance. By embedding mission fidelity into processes and resisting overreliance on short-term metrics, organizations can strengthen stakeholder confidence and sustain credibility while adapting to uncertainty and resource volatility.Social implicationsPrincipled resilience enables organizations to balance accountability with ethical commitments, supporting trust-based relationships and long-term societal value – especially in hybrid and legitimacy-sensitive environments.Originality/valueThis paper offers a novel conceptualization of resilience that foregrounds values, legitimacy and responsibility as foundations of organizational endurance. It extends paradox theory and resilience-as-practice while providing a coherent, empirically testable framework for responsible governance and sustainable social impact. In governance terms, the framework specifies how value-aligned routines (process orientation) and metric discipline (outcome independence) operate as governance mechanisms that protect mission integrity and legitimacy under accountability pressure.

Keywords: Principled resilience; Mission fidelity; Responsible governance; Ethical consistency; Stakeholder trust; CSR; NGOs (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.emerald.com/srj/article/doi/10.1108/SR ... NGOs-a-values-driven (text/html)
https://www.emerald.com/srj/article-pdf/doi/10.110 ... j-10-2025-1023en.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eme:srjpps:srj-10-2025-1023

DOI: 10.1108/SRJ-10-2025-1023

Access Statistics for this article

Social Responsibility Journal is currently edited by Prof David Crowther

More articles in Social Responsibility Journal from Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Emerald Support ().