 Antimicrobial resistance and the non-accountability effect on consumers’ behaviourAnna-Carin Nordvall, Mirko Ancillotti, Emma Oljans and Elin Nilsson Social Responsibility Journal, 2025, vol. 21, issue 5, 1125-1143 Abstract: Purpose - A status quo situation has occurred among actors, policymakers, producers, retailers and consumers where no one takes the lead on the antimicrobial resistance (AMR) fight. Common theoretical approaches to behaviour including awareness, understanding and use are insufficient in the AMR context. In this paper, the authors suggest the application of accountability literature to fully understand the status quo situation with AMR. Design/methodology/approach - AMR in food has become an alarming problem in the past decade and is an increasing threat to global health. The knowledge about AMR often comes from a medical context where the perspective is completely different. Therefore, it is difficult for consumers to apply this to a grocery store context purchasing food. Findings - This paper uses the concept of accountability and the significant other within the accountability field and discusses how this could help overcome the non-action state of mind of consumers and other actors. Practical implications - Enhanced accountability could significantly improve One-Health solutions for combating AMR. By fostering a culture of shared responsibility and transparent communication among stakeholders, the silo effect may be mitigated, promoting collaborative efforts. Accountability mechanisms should ensure that roles and responsibilities are clearly defined and communicated across sectors, such as health care, agriculture and policymaking. Educational initiatives can increase AMR awareness, enabling stakeholders to make informed decisions. Integrating perspectives from various domains will facilitate the development of holistic strategies, thus improving the overall effectiveness of efforts to address AMR and ensuring a sustainable approach to public health. Social implications - Enhanced accountability in AMR management can lead to significant social benefits. By promoting transparency and collective responsibility, communities can foster greater trust and cooperation among various stakeholders, including health-care providers, policymakers and consumers. Increased awareness of AMR can empower individuals to make informed decisions, thereby promoting public health and safety. Socially, this could lead to more sustainable practices in antibiotic use and a reduction in the spread of resistant infections. In addition, fostering a culture of accountability ensures that efforts to combat AMR are more inclusive, equitable and effective, ultimately benefiting society as a whole. Originality/value - The proposal to create strategies according to a basis of accountability can be applied at all levels of the AMR problem and for all actors. This therefore provides important knowledge about how AMR can be approached in a more long-term way where initiatives to prevent the spread of AMR do not take place in parallel or become difficult to access. Keywords: Antimicrobial resistance; Behaviour change; Sustainable consumer behaviour; Sustainable health; Accountability (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eme:srjpps:srj-12-2023-0721 Access Statistics for this article Social Responsibility Journal is currently edited by Prof David Crowther More articles in Social Responsibility Journal from Emerald Group Publishing Limited |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.