Philosophical issues in responsible investment: a care-ethical approach

Tommi Juhani Lehtonen

Social Responsibility Journal, 2013, vol. 9, issue 4, 589-602

Abstract: Purpose - – This paper aims to examine ethical investment problems related to fiduciary responsibilities. Design/methodology/approach - – The present study discusses these issues from the perspective of stock investment. It identifies, validates and explains the ethical problems and possibilities concerning the principles of responsible investment. The paper focuses on, but is not restricted to, the United Nations-backed Principles for Responsible Investment. Findings - – The United Nations-backed Principles for Responsible Investment give investors moral freedoms, although from the point-of-view of most moral theories, only such investments that serve the well-being of people and the environment would be ethically responsible. The legitimacy of fiduciary responsibilities is motivated by the pursuit of economic gain, which is essential for business on the one hand but ethically problematic on the other, if the “invisible hand” of the economy does not work and wealth accumulates in the hands of only a few people. Research limitations/implications - – This vision presented in the paper (albeit practically relevant) is obviously general and many details, including the starting points of the care-ethical approach and the moral rating of stock portfolios, need to be developed further. Practical implications - – The vision proposes, in essence, a care-ethical approach according to which only such investments that promote the general good and welfare are morally acceptable. From this perspective, investment should primarily serve people and the environment, and therefore investments should only be made, based on a careful evaluation, in ethically acceptable and economically profitable companies that contribute to the human and environmental good. Originality/value - – This subject matter has been much discussed; however, the perspective and starting points of this article, especially the ethics of care, are new and add novel ideas to the conversation.

Keywords: Care ethics; Degrowth; Ethical investment; Fiduciary responsibilities; Responsible investment; UN Principles for Responsible Investment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (text/html)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eme:srjpps:v:9:y:2013:i:4:p:589-602

DOI: 10.1108/SRJ-08-2012-0087

Access Statistics for this article

Social Responsibility Journal is currently edited by Prof David Crowther

More articles in Social Responsibility Journal from Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Emerald Support ().