How trade affects international interactions

Solomon Polachek

Economics of Peace and Security Journal, 2007, vol. 2, issue 2, 60-68

Abstract: A viable peace is one that comes about naturally and persists without the need for outside intervention. At least since Baron de Montesquieu’s statement that “peace is the natural effect of trade. Two nations who traffic with each other become reciprocally dependent; for if one has the interest in buying, the other has the interest in selling and thus their union is founded on the mutual necessities (1748) a number of economists and political scientists maintained that trade among nations leads to peace. That logic is as follows: if a target country that is the recipient of conflict retaliates by cutting its trade ties with the conflict instigator, then a portion of the costs of conflict born by the instigator results from its lost gains from trade. Conflict is more costly the higher these gains from trade losses. This article summarizes some of the empirical work testing this proposition.

Keywords: Trade; conflict (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D74 F1 H56 O1 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2007
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.epsjournal.org.uk/index.php/EPSJ/article/view/52 (application/pdf)
Open access 24 months after original publication.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:epc:journl:v:2:y:2007:i:2:p:60-68

Access Statistics for this article

Economics of Peace and Security Journal is currently edited by Michael Brown and J Paul Dunne

More articles in Economics of Peace and Security Journal from EPS Publishing Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael Brown, Managing Editor, EPSJ ().