POLISH PERSPECTIVES ON CEE-CHINA 16+1 COOPERATION: THE UNEXPECTED UKRAINIAN FACTOR
Rafał Tuszyński ()
Europolity – Continuity and Change in European Governance - New Series, 2015, vol. 9, issue 1, 32
Abstract:
The initiation in Warsaw of the CEE-China cooperation (so called 16+1 format) in 2012 has aroused many hopes in participating countries, since many of them were cash-strapped after the global financial crisis and China offered credit lines as well as know-how in infrastructure building. At the beginning, Poland viewed 16+1 as a useful platform to prove its growing diplomatic clout in CEE because China claimed that Poland is a natural and real leader of the 16+1. As the 16+1 cooperation matured this format quickly showed a major drawback – China uses the diversity among the 16 CEE countries (e.g. EU and non-EU status) to promote its own interests (divide et impera). The Chinese strategy turned out to be particularly at odds with Polish foreign policy goals, since from Warsaw's point of view the unity of the EU at all fronts in the face of Russian aggression on Ukraine is of the utmost necessity. Moreover Polish diplomacy is becoming more and more sceptical of 16+1 because of the EU's pressure to toe the line of EU framework of cooperation with China. The absence of Polish PM Ewa Kopacz at the 16+1 Belgrade Summit in December 2014 may result in a change of Chinese attitude towards 16+1.
Date: 2015
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://europolity.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Vol.9.No_.1.2015_189-220.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:epl:eplnew:y:2015:v:9:i:1:p:189-220
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Europolity – Continuity and Change in European Governance - New Series from Department of International Relations and European Integration, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oana-Andreea Ion ().