EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Comparative Analysis of the Compressive Strength of Glass Ionomer and Alkasite Restorative Materials over Tricalcium Silicate

Betsabé DeLaCruz-Corona, Alexandra Gómez-Castro, Julio César García-Briones, Adolfo Neftalí García-Barrón, Benjamín González-Vizcarra and Fernanda Araiza-Verduzco
Additional contact information
Betsabé DeLaCruz-Corona: Autonomous University of Baja California, México
Alexandra Gómez-Castro: Autonomous University of Baja California, México
Julio César García-Briones: Autonomous University of Baja California, México
Adolfo Neftalí García-Barrón: Autonomous University of Baja California, México
Benjamín González-Vizcarra: Autonomous University of Baja California, México
Fernanda Araiza-Verduzco: Autonomous University of Baja California, México

European Journal of Dental and Oral Health, 2025, vol. 6, issue 4, 4-7

Abstract: This study’s objective was to compare compressive strength of two restorative materials, glass ionomer (EQUIA forte) and alkasite (Cention N), when used over tricalcium silicate (Biodentine) as a pulp capping material. An in vitro study was conducted using 30 extracted premolars without caries, restorations od resorption. Standardized Class I cavities were prepared, lined with 1 mm layer of Biodentine, and restored with the two materials mentioned before. Samples underwent mechanical testing using a universal testing machine. Compressive strength was calculated, and results were analyzed using Student’s t-test. No statistically significant difference was observed between the compressive strength of glass ionomer (mean: 17.56 MPa) and alkasite (mean: 13.88 MPa) restorations(p = 0.3304). Stereomicroscopy revealed adhesive failure in the alkasite group and better dentin adhesion in the glass ionomer group, as well as higher punctual values. Both restorative materials demonstrated comparable compressive strength when used over tri calcium silicate. The findings support their interchangeable use, with selection potentially guided by clinical preference, availability, and cost.

Keywords: Alkasite; compressive strength; glass ionomer; restorative materials (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejdent/article/view/13384 Abstract page (text/html)
https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejdent/article/download/13384/3061 Full text (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:epw:ejdent:v:6:y:2025:i:4:id:13384

DOI: 10.24018/ejdent.2025.6.4.384

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in European Journal of Dental and Oral Health from European Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Support Team ().

 
Page updated 2026-06-22
Handle: RePEc:epw:ejdent:v:6:y:2025:i:4:id:13384