EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Mathematical Modeling of Catalytic Cracking Fluidized Bed Process for the Production of Hydrocarbons

Sajjad Porgar and Somayeh Salehfekr
Additional contact information
Sajjad Porgar: Department of engineering, Shahr-e-Qods-shahryar branch,Islamic azad university, Tehran,Iran
Somayeh Salehfekr: Department of engineering, Shahr-e-Qods-shahryar branch,Islamic azad university, Tehran,Iran

European Journal of Engineering and Technology Research, 2018, vol. 1, issue 5, 23-28

Abstract: The purpose of the catalytic cracking process fluid bed is conversion of heavy oil to light hydrocarbon at a lower cost and more reliable method. Some of the products include with the distillates, gasoline and light olefins. Efficient performance of catalytic cracking fluidized bed for the refinery economy is essential and important process in oil refineries. The efficiency of the FCC unit depends to a large number of parameters such as feed composition, residence time, temperature, the ratio of catalyst to feedstock oil, catalytic properties, the partial pressure of hydrocarbons and hydrodynamic riser.In this study fluidized bed catalytic cracking process modeling was performed and operating conditions as input to the program and the results obtained. The modeling of kinetic model was used four lumps, first order and changes in radius is ignored. The balance of energy, mass and momentum are written that yield can be calculated via the mass balance, velocity can be achieved through the momentum equation and temperature profiles during reactor can be obtained via energy balance. Products yield, profiles of temperature and velocity of the gas phase were obtained by using the proposed model. The results showed that feed efficiency is increased and products yields are reduced during reactor length. It was observed that during the process catalyst performance is decreased and also compare the results with experimental results indicate good agreement between the proposed model and industrial results that these results can be used to achieve high-precision products. The mean error is 3.3% for gasoline yield, 5.5% for coke yields and 2% for reactor temperature.

Keywords: cracking; fluidized bed; modeling; hydrocarbons (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejeng/article/view/60189 Abstract page (text/html)
https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejeng/article/download/60189/11716 Full text (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:epw:ejeng0:v:1:y:2018:i:5:id:60189

DOI: 10.24018/ejeng.2016.1.5.189

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in European Journal of Engineering and Technology Research from European Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Support ().

 
Page updated 2026-06-22
Handle: RePEc:epw:ejeng0:v:1:y:2018:i:5:id:60189