Comparison of a Tannery that Using the Conventional Treatment of Waste Water and That Using the Recycling Method

Rehab Ahmed Salman, G. A. Gasmelseed and R. S. Hassan

European Journal of Engineering and Technology Research, 2020, vol. 5, issue 2, 124-126

Abstract: The conventional treatment methods of tannery spent float is found to be not sufficient to meet the required international standers levels of liquid discharges on the other hand the establishment of the treatment unit for the physical, biological and chemical treatment of the spent float is found to be extremely high-cost process. During the life time of the tannery by using the recycling of the spent float method, there would be a great saving in the water and the chemicals as well as environment protection. The comparison of the capital cost estimates of two tanneries with the same capacity, one with the conventional treatment method (large treatment unit should be established) and the other used the recycling of the spent float process, show the advantages of using the recycling process over the conventional treatment process.

Keywords: Tannery; Liquid Waste; Treatment; Recycling; Cost Effectiveness (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejeng/article/view/61745 Abstract page (text/html)
https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejeng/article/download/61745/12338 Full text (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:epw:ejeng0:v:5:y:2020:i:2:id:61745

DOI: 10.24018/ejeng.2020.5.2.1745

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in European Journal of Engineering and Technology Research from European Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Support ().