¿Cual es la realidad del empresariado colombiano frente a las ciencias sociales?

Abel Maria Cano Morales

Observatorio de la Economía Latinoamericana, 2004, issue 33

Abstract: In the middle of the century XX, businessman signified to be an owner or high manager of a medium or great business, located in a modern sector of the economy in which he operated with free workers, which they acted under the perspective of a just salary in an economy jousts, using machines and teams to produce the goods and necessary services for the sostenimiento internal. The concept was used to distinguish of the old oligarchy, of large landowners that exploited the land using rural labor badly paid, with a heterogeneous technological application of base, splits modern and splits traditional, the education for the first businessmen was not important factor, but if they desired that their children distinguish thieved in educational institutions preferably of the outside. In this order of ideas the National Institutions of higher education, they did not consider important to tie the social sciences with the business sector, whose development was given gradually, this united to the state protectionism, they forged the first businessmen that with few knowledge, but with a high touch toward the business, they conceived the first businesses of great size. With the economic opening and the privatization of some state businesses, they were created what knows themselves like the business elite’s which they have tied themselves a great deal more through the market with the assembly of the population. Are now the main employers, and suppliers of goods and services. But the conditions of work and income and the quality of products offered by the now usual private sector to think about the client, is distant a great deal if there is modernized or to be socially acceptable. All it contrasts with the administrative predominance of new theories such as Reengineer, Total Quality, Benchmarking, Downsizing, some of which present the strengthening or empowerment of the officials what we will call (change toward inside of the company), and the social responsibility of the business known as (change toward outside). The main problem, nevertheless, is that this modernization does not have, as opposed to the countries developed an institutional living where to prosper. The economic elite’s that handle the largest businesses and conglomerates maintain then a weak relation with their context and, therefore, continue suffering from social isolation. Do not they be positively integrated with its extensive environment in the sense that there is not ties that found to the different social groups.

Date: 2004
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.eumed.net/cursecon/ecolat/co/abcm-ccss.htm (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:erv:observ:y:2004:33:camo

Access Statistics for this article

Observatorio de la Economía Latinoamericana is currently edited by FUTURE PUBLISHERS GROUP LTDA. Desde 01/01/2023

More articles in Observatorio de la Economía Latinoamericana from Servicios Académicos Intercontinentales SL. Hasta 31/12/2022
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Lisette Villamizar ().