Measuring the Cycle and Structural Shocks
Marta Lopresto and
Additional contact information
Marta Lopresto: National Institute of Economic and Social Research
The Economic and Social Review, 2019, vol. 50, issue 1, 103-117
The rules that guide fiscal policy in many countries are often specified in terms of cyclically-adjusted measures of the budget deficit. Accounting for the cycle is important because public finances are flattered when the economy is cyclically strong. However measuring the cycle is difficult as the uncertainty surrounding estimates of potential output is significant, especially when the economy is hit by structural shocks. As a consequence, a fiscal framework targeting measures of cyclically-adjusted budget positions and point forecasts has led to spending and taxes being influenced by contentious forecasting assumptions. A more robust approach would take account of the unreliability of the cyclical adjustment or forecasts. A suggestion is to focus on risks around medium-term fiscal forecasts, supported by an independent watchdog. This would contribute to sustainable policy, while avoiding excess sensitivity to forecasts.
Keywords: fiscal policy; structural shocks (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eso:journl:v:50:y:2019:i:1:p:103-117
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in The Economic and Social Review from Economic and Social Studies
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Aedin Doris ().