EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Science and Religion as Conceptual Schemes

Michele Marsonet

Academicus International Scientific Journal, 2012, issue 5, 17-25

Abstract: It is claimed sometimes that science on the one hand, and metaphysics and religion on the other, are incompatible conceptual schemes, in the sense that their statements are not inter-translatable. Our view, instead, is that science and religion deal with fundamentally diverse aspects of human experience. This means that, when each field stays within its proper domain, they can get along without problems. We must deny the still popular opinion that science is the only instrument which allows us to know nature. And we must also question the idea that science has acquired the exclusive right to speak about nature by progressively expelling metaphysics from the field. In order to do this one should, however, reject the neo-positivist characterization of the relations among science, metaphysics, theology and religion.

Keywords: Science; Religion; Metaphysics; Conceptual Schemes; Inter-translatability (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://academicus.edu.al/nr5/Academicus-MMXII-5-017-025.pdf (application/pdf)
https://academicus.edu.al/nr5/Academicus-MMXII-5-017-025.html (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:etc:journl:y:2012:i:5:p:17-25

Access Statistics for this article

Academicus International Scientific Journal is currently edited by Arta Musaraj

More articles in Academicus International Scientific Journal from Entrepreneurship Training Center Albania Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Gabor Vasmatics ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:etc:journl:y:2012:i:5:p:17-25