Attacking Poverty: Is It Globalisation?… Or Is It the Institutions?

Laurens Cherchye and A. Watteyne

Review of Business and Economic Literature, 2003, vol. XLVIII, issue 4, 573-602

Abstract: We empirically analyze the relationship between globalisation and poverty. Deviating from the mainstream literature, we use ‘synthetic’ globalisation and poverty indicators, which combine multiple single indicators into single-valued statistics. Further, we study a sample that includes OECD countries as well as non-OECD countries, which allows us to examine the effect of structural differences between countries (summarized in a OECD dummy). Our results reveal no significant effect of globalisation on poverty when correcting for the OECD effect. We argue that this suggests institutional quality as a more fundamental determinant of a country’s poverty performance than the degree of integration with the global economy. On the methodological level, our use of synthetic indicators entails a parsimonious specification of the globalisation-poverty relationship, which increases its transparency.

Date: 2003-04
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://feb.kuleuven.be/rebel/jaargangen/2001-2010/2003/TEM2003-4/02_Cherchye.pdf

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ete:revbec:20030402

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Review of Business and Economic Literature from KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), Review of Business and Economic Literature Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by library EBIB ().