Adam Smith’s Legacy for Ethics and Economics

P.H. Werhane

Review of Business and Economic Literature, 2006, vol. LI, issue 2, 199-212

Abstract: This article challenges a popular understanding of the Wealth of Nations. According to this reading of Smith, self-interested, economic actors in free competition with each other unintentionally create a self-constraining system. This system, the “invisible hand” which governs market transactions, functions both to regulate these self-interests and to produce economic growth and well-being such that no one actor or group of actors can take advantage of other actors or take advantage for very long. We suggest that this is a misreading of Smith. Smith is not a laissez- faire economist. Economic exchanges occur and markets are efficient, according to Smith, precisely because we are not merely non-tuistic, and economic growth depends on what today we call the rule of law. Smith was the Professor of Moral Philosophy at Glasgow, and argues precisely against, and may not have even imagined, a separation of ethics from economics, ethics from commerce; or ethics from his idea of a viable political economy.

Date: 2006
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://feb.kuleuven.be/rebel/jaargangen/2001-2010/ ... 006-2_01_Werhane.pdf

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ete:revbec:20060201

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Review of Business and Economic Literature from KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), Review of Business and Economic Literature Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by library EBIB ().