The determinants of public expenditure on educational infrastructural facilities and economic growth in Nigeria
Greg Edame and
Agboro Diepreye Eturoma
Additional contact information
Greg Edame: Department of economics, Ebonyi state University, Abakiliki-Ebonyi state, Nigeria
Agboro Diepreye Eturoma: Department of economics, University of Calabar, Calabar-Nigeria
E3 Journal of Business Management and Economics., 2014, vol. 5, issue 6, 152-161
Public expenditure on education is of great importance to any national development and plays a critical role in promoting growth and equity, and through both channels, help to reduce poor quality as well as improving the standard of education. In Nigeria over the years, poor financial resources to the educational sector have been a major problem in the educational system. Poor financing of the educational sector has resulted to poor attendance, poor quality of students, inadequate preparation by teachers at all levels and low morale of teachers as a result of low basic condition of services and low salaries. The major objective of this study is to examine the Determinants of public expenditure on Infrastructural facilities in education and economic growth in Nigeria based on time series data on variables considered relevant indicators of economic growth and public expenditure. A public expenditure model was constructed and tested using the ordinary least squares (OLS) technique. A dummy variable was introduced to test the expenditure variability between regime changes (military and civilian) to ascertain which regime allocated more funds to the educational sector in Nigeria during the period under the study. Data for the study was obtained from the Central Bank of Nigeria, NBS and the World Bank. Results of the analysis showed that public expenditure on education has a significant impact on economic growth. But expenditure on education is different between regimes but not significant. Consequently, in model (1), Adult Enrolment ratio (AER) influenced Real Gross Domestic Product (RGDP) by 540.4365 at a unit change, and AER is not a good predictor of economic growth, while in some it does, while model (2) result showed that expenditure in education during the civilian regime had the intercept of 22932.02, the military regime spent 22927.89 more than the civilian regime in Nigeria.
Keywords: Economic Growth; Public Expenditure; Educational Infrastructure; Military; Civilian regimes. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://e3journals.org/cms/articles/1411270840_GregandAgboro.pdf Full text
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:etr:series:v:5:y:2014:i:06:p:152-161
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in E3 Journal of Business Management and Economics. from E3 Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Andrew Godwin ().