EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

A crítica novo-institucionalista ao pensamento da Cepal: a dimensão institucional e o papel da ideologia no desenvolvimento econômico

Hélio Afonso de Aguilar Filho and Edison Benedito da Silva Filho

Revista Economia e Sociedade, 2010, vol. 40, 22

Abstract: The new institutional economics critique on ECLA thought: the institutional dimension and the role of ideology in economic development - This paper aims at discussing the validity of criticism raised by New Institutional Economics against ECLA (or Cepal) explanation of Latin America economic underdevelopment. We shall argue that the cepalista approach neither neglects the institutional dimension of the economic development nor is limited to provide reasoning for the adoption of economic policies that would reinforce the ineffectiveness of the institutional matrix of those countries. While demonstrating that such criticism is misplaced, we shall also emphasize the viability of a common research agenda between ECLA school and economic institutionalism.

Keywords: Economic Council for Latin America (ECLA); New Institutional Economics (NIE); Institutionalism; Stru (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: B15 B25 B31 B52 N16 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.eco.unicamp.br/publicacoes/download.php ... odEdicao=40&codArt=1 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:euc:ancoec:v:40:y:2010:p:211-232

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Revista Economia e Sociedade from Instituto de Economia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Antonio Carlos Macedo e Silva ().

 
Page updated 2017-09-29
Handle: RePEc:euc:ancoec:v:40:y:2010:p:211-232