EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Malaysian Product Design Identity: Review on the ‘Keywords’

Amirul Fahmi Razali and David Hands
Additional contact information
Amirul Fahmi Razali: Department of Design Technology, Lancaster University, England

European Journal of Economics and Business Studies Articles, 2017, vol. 3

Abstract: Considering Malaysia as a multi-ethnic country, it is difficult to determine and define the cultural identity to represent Malaysia (Mun, Fern, - Chin, 2015), and use it as a characteristic in designing a product. This has been a challenging issue for most Malaysian local designers to design a Malaysia-look product based on a national identity characteristic. There is no proof that the product characteristic can be summed up or generalized based on the understanding of multi-ethnic agreement decision-making (Zainal, Othman, - Samsudin, 2015). With regards to Malaysia, the primary issue is about the national identity identification for product design. This issue then prompted to the question that would Malaysian designers be able to establish a Malaysian product with a national identity by looking at this multi-ethnic society? This research reviews the literature concerning Malaysian identity based on articles and visuals. It aims at getting the general keywords related to the components in culture and yet to be incorporated with the design characteristics at the beginning of ideation process. The basis of this study is referring to the dominant culture study by Edensor (2002), cultural identity components evaluation by Ibrahim (2015), and culture and identity ‘key issues’ by Clarke (2011). By understanding the cultural component within the society, pulling out the keywords, and validating the chosen keywords by conducting a survey, these keywords will act as the guidance in visualising a characteristic; and there will be greater chances for Malaysian designer to success in developing products with strong Malaysian identities.

Keywords: Cultural components; Malaysian identities; Product design characteristics1. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://brucol.be/index.php/ejes/article/view/5363 (text/html)
https://brucol.be/files/articles/ejes_v3_i2_17/Amiru.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eur:ejesjr:144

DOI: 10.26417/ejes.v8i1.p156-175

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in European Journal of Economics and Business Studies Articles from Revistia Research and Publishing
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Revistia Research and Publishing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-24
Handle: RePEc:eur:ejesjr:144