Cinema and Philosophical Education: from Wittgenstein to Deleuze

JÅ«ratÄ— Baranova
Additional contact information
JÅ«ratÄ— Baranova: Department of Philosophy, Lithuanian University of Educational Sciences

European Journal of Language and Literature Studies Articles, 2015, vol. 1

Abstract: Bruce Russell argues, that cinema cannot create the philosophical knowledge for the reason that the answers to philosophical questions are contradictory and not obvious, the explicit argumentation is needed if the person is inclined to give justified answers to philosophical questions. Given examples are not satisfactory for philosophizing. On the other hand Slavoj Žižek, Stanley Cavell and Gilles Deleuze seems do not see this obvious gap between cinema and philosophy. They discuss the cinema as philosophy. What presumptions are needed for this approach? How this approach could be adapted in the philosophy education?

Keywords: cinema; philosophical education; Wittgenstein; Deleuze (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://brucol.be/index.php/ejls/article/view/8290 (text/html)
https://brucol.be/files/articles/ejls_v1_i3_15/Jurate.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eur:ejlsjr:30

DOI: 10.26417/ejls.v3i1.p21-31

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in European Journal of Language and Literature Studies Articles from Revistia Research and Publishing
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Revistia Research and Publishing ().