Economic Situation in the Far Eastern Federal District in 2020

Olga Mikhailovna Prokapalo (), Anna Bardal, Artyom Gennadyevich Isaev (), Marina Gamilovna Mazitova () and Denis Vladimirovich Suslov ()
Additional contact information
Olga Mikhailovna Prokapalo: Economic Research Institute FEB RAS
Artyom Gennadyevich Isaev: Economic Research Institute FEB RAS
Marina Gamilovna Mazitova: Economic Research Institute FEB RAS
Denis Vladimirovich Suslov: Economic Research Institute FEB RAS

Spatial Economics=Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika, 2021, issue 2, 81-126

Abstract: The article includes an analysis of the most significant trends in the socio-economic development of the Far Eastern Federal District in 2020 in the context of administrative units and main types of economic activity. The analysis is based on advanced statistical, analytical, and expert information. The article considers the most important factors and issues of the functioning of the real sector of the economy, the social sphere, and foreign economic activity in the conditions of uncertainty in the oil and foreign exchange markets, as well as the implementation of quarantine and restrictive measures due to the propagation of the coronavirus infection. There is a decrease in investment in Amur Oblast, Sakhalin Oblast, Primorsky Krai, and the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia), which are the main ‘investment-intensive’ regions of the Far Eastern Federal District. There is still a significant industry asymmetry when it comes to attracting foreign direct investment, most of which is concentrated in the exploration and production of fuel and energy resources. The negative impact of macroeconomic shocks has led to a decrease in the volume of production in the industrial complex of the macroregion, especially affecting mechanical engineering, oil refining, and production of construction materials in Primorsky Krai and Khabarovsk Krai. The failure to implement the plans for the development of the railway infrastructure in the context of the growth of cargo flows to the seaports of the Far Eastern basin led to restrictions on cargo transportation. The reduction in the real monetary income of people in most regions of the Far Eastern Federal District is becoming a factor in reducing the attractiveness of the Far East as the high income area. The population of the macroregion has continued to decline not only due to migration outflow, but also due to natural population decline as a result of both factors of objective decline in the birth rate and the social and economic consequences of the pandemic

Keywords: monitoring; GRP; industrial production; investment; inflation; labor market; standard of living; foreign trade; foreign investment; Far Eastern Federal District (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: L19 P25 R12 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.spatial-economics.com/images/spatial-ec ... 81-126.Prokapalo.pdf (application/pdf)
http://spatial-economics.com/eng/arkhiv-nomerov/20 ... 003-SE-2021-2-81-126 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:far:spaeco:y:2021:i:2:p:81-126

DOI: 10.14530/se.2021.2.081-126

Access Statistics for this article

Spatial Economics=Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika is currently edited by Pavel Minakir

More articles in Spatial Economics=Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika from Economic Research Institute, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences (Khabarovsk, Russia) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sergey Rogov ().