Potential Effects of the Affordable Care Act on the Award of Life Care Expenses

Joshua Congdon-Hohman and Victor Matheson

Journal of Forensic Economics, 2013, vol. 24, issue 2, 153-160

Abstract: Plaintiffs in personal injury lawsuits are entitled to compensation for future medical expenses. We argue that the “guaranteed issue” and “individual mandate” requirements of the recently passed Affordable Care Act (ACA) will allow victims to address a large portion of their health needs through the purchase of a simple health insurance plan rather than direct compensation for an itemized list of health care needs. As such, damage awards for many health expenditures should be capped at a maximum of $6,250 per year. Therefore, the role of a life care planner should evolve into determining which life care expenses are covered under the minimum insurance requirements mandated by the ACA and which entail additional expenditures beyond those covered by health insurance.

JEL-codes: K13 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.journalofforensiceconomics.com/doi/abs/10.5085/jfe.24.2.153 (text/html)
http://www.journalofforensiceconomics.com/doi/pdf/10.5085/jfe.24.2.153 (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Potential Effects of the Affordable Care Act on the Award of Life Care Expenses (2012)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fek:papers:doi:10.5085/jfe.24.2.153

DOI: 10.5085/jfe.24.2.153

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Forensic Economics from National Association of Forensic Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kurt Krueger ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).