Optimal Environmental Taxation, R&D Subsidization and the Role of Market Conduct
Additional contact information
Joanna Poyago-Thotoky: Department of Economics, University of St Andrews, United Kingdom
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Joanna Poyago-Theotoky
Finnish Economic Papers, 2003, vol. 16, issue 1, 15-26
The paper examines the optimal environmental policy in a differentiated goods duopoly with either price- or quantity-setting firms, where firms invest in environmental R&D that reduces emissions. It is shown that in quantity (Cournot) competition, the emission tax is always lower than marginal damages. With price (Bertrand) competition, the emission tax is generally lower than marginal damages. However, for the case of very undifferentiated products, the emission tax is equal to marginal damages, that is, it approaches the first-best tax. Moreover, the Cournot emission tax is always lower than the Bertand emission tax. Concerning the R&D subsidy, the comparison crucially depends on the degree of product differentiation and the initial emissions coefficient.
JEL-codes: Q28 O38 H29 L13 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Working Paper: Optimal environmental taxation, R&D subsidization and the role of market conduct (2003)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fep:journl:v:16:y:2003:i:1:p:15-26
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Finnish Economic Papers from Finnish Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Editorial Secretary ().