The Two-Parameter Long-Horizon Value-at-Risk

Guy Kaplanski

Frontiers in Finance and Economics, 2010, vol. 7, issue 1, 1-20

Abstract: Value-at-Risk (VaR) has become a standard measure for risk management and regulation. In the case of a two-parameter distribution, a common method among practitioners is first to calculate the daily VaR and then to apply it to a longer investment horizon by using the Square Root Rule (SRR). We show that the SRR is theoretically incorrect and propose a correct measure. The error from employing the SRR is positive for short horizons, inducing an overestimation of the true VaR, and negative for longer horizons, inducing underestimation of the true VaR. This error is relatively small for conservative portfolios and for short horizons. However, for risky portfolios and for long horizons – where accurate VaR is most important – the underestimation error is both substantial and systematic.

Keywords: Risk analysis; Risk management; Value-at-Risk; Basel regulations; Square Root Rule. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C10 C13 C46 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.ffe.esc-lille.com/papers/Vol7-1ms308Kaplanski.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ffe:journl:v:7:y:2010:i:1:p:1-20

Access Statistics for this article

Frontiers in Finance and Economics is currently edited by Ephraim Clark

More articles in Frontiers in Finance and Economics from SKEMA Business School
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sophie Bodo ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).