Evaluation and Comparison of Market and Rating Based Country Default Risk Assessment
Dominik Maltritz Alexander Karmann ()
Additional contact information
Dominik Maltritz Alexander Karmann: Dresden University of Technology, Germany
Frontiers in Finance and Economics, 2010, vol. 7, issue 1, 34-59
We compare two different approaches to assess country default risk by evaluating their forecast accuracy. In particular we analyze whether market based or rating based risk assessment is superior. To evaluate the forecast accuracy we analyze the differences between several default risk measures and realizations of defaults/non defaults in the forecast period. The considered risk measures are, on the one hand, default probabilities and binary crisis forecasts (default/non default), on the other. Within a sample of 19 emerging market countries in 1998 to 2007 we find that risk measures derived by reduced form credit risk models from market data outperform ratings of S&P.
Keywords: sovereign risk; ratings; yield spreads; forecast accuracy; country default (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F34 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ffe:journl:v:7:y:2010:i:1:p:34-59
Access Statistics for this article
Frontiers in Finance and Economics is currently edited by Ephraim Clark
More articles in Frontiers in Finance and Economics from SKEMA Business School
Series data maintained by Sophie Bodo (). This e-mail address is bad, please contact .