Governança e pensamento estratégico: uma crítica a Michael Porter

Omar Aktouf

RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas, 2002, vol. 42, issue 3

Abstract: In this essay, the author analyses, or more precisely deconstructs, the essence of thinking about “strategy”and the overall governance of organizations predominating the current academic management scene. By drawing on a simultaneously historical, heuristic, epistemological and methodological reading of the dominant work and system on this subject, which he refers to as “porterism”, the author presents a resolutely critical review of the full range of theories of managerial “strategy” as well as those of the most notable author in the field, namely, Michael Porter.

Date: 2002
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/rae/article/view/37597 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fgv:eaerae:v:42:y:2002:i:3:a:37597

Access Statistics for this article

RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas is currently edited by Eduardo Diniz

More articles in RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas from FGV-EAESP Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (Brazil)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Núcleo de Computação da FGV EPGE ().