Se publicar é preciso, avaliar também é!

Marcelo de Souza Bispo

RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas, 2018, vol. 58, issue 4

Abstract: The subject of “reviewing articles” is a relevant part of the daily life of every researcher. However, my experience as an editor and reviewer for Brazilian and international journals indicates that the level of commitment of researchers, in general, is much less when they are reviewing as compared to when they are authoring an article. The prestige of being published in a leading journal is not the same as being an outstanding reviewer in the same journal. Such asymmetry is contradictory, since peer review is the primary system that gauges the quality of scientific output and is as important for the survival of a journal as the submission of articles. The quality of the reviewers and their reviews must be equal or higher than the published articles in order to ensure the system’s credibility.

Date: 2018
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/rae/article/view/75325 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fgv:eaerae:v:58:y:2018:i:4:a:75325

Access Statistics for this article

RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas is currently edited by Eduardo Diniz

More articles in RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas from FGV-EAESP Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (Brazil)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Núcleo de Computação da FGV EPGE ().