Context, conflict, weights, and identities: some psychological aspects of decision making

Eldar Shafir

Conference Series ; [Proceedings], 2003, vol. 48, issue Jun

Abstract: Experimental psychology provides a drastically different picture of human abilities, motives, and behavior from that which predominates economic analyses. Individual preferences are normatively assumed to be well-ordered and consistent, but descriptively shown to be inconsistent and malleable. Not having at their disposal clear and reliable procedures for assigning values to options, people need to construct their preferences in the context of decision, which is rife with, among other things, conflict, emotion, contextual influences, and shifts in perspective and attention. Like many other traits and behaviors, preference inconsistency is the outcome not of distracted shortcuts or avoidable errors, but of fundamental aspects of mental life that are central to how people process information. Thus, it may help to think of individual decision makers not as faulty economic agents, but as fundamentally different creatures.

Keywords: Economic policy; Macroeconomics; Economics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2003
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.bostonfed.org/economic/conf/conf48/papers/shafir.pdf (application/pdf)
http://www.bostonfed.org/economic/conf/conf48/index.htm (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedbcp:y:2003:i:jun:n:48:x:5

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Conference Series ; [Proceedings] from Federal Reserve Bank of Boston Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Spozio ().