Can local governments give citizens what they want? Referendum outcomes in Massachusetts

Katharine Bradbury

New England Economic Review, 1991, issue May, 3-22

Abstract: Economists and political scientists have long debated the nature of the process that determines government taxation and service levels in a democracy. During the 1980s, the role of referenda in determining city and town property taxes, and hence local spending, increased dramatically in Massachusetts. This article uses recent Massachusetts experience to examine the degree to which citizens \"get what they want\" from the local public sector and what it is they seem to want. ; The passage of Proposition 21/2 in November 1980 signalled both a shift in statewide voter sentiment against local officials previously \"unfettered\" decision-making and a change in rules, making it more difficult for localities to raise property taxes, their only major local revenue source. The impact has been uneven across communities. Nonetheless, until late in the decade, both sizable additions to local aid and a booming real estate market allowed many communities expenditures to grow moderately without bumping against their Proposition 2 limits.

Keywords: Local finance; Massachusetts (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1991
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.bostonfed.org/economic/neer/neer1991/neer391a.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedbne:y:1991:i:may:p:3-22

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in New England Economic Review from Federal Reserve Bank of Boston Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Spozio ().