The municipal bond market, part II: problems and policies

Peter Fortune

New England Economic Review, 1992, issue May, 47-64

Abstract: Why does Congress allow municipal interest payments to be exempted from federal income taxes in the face of a very large chronic deficit in the federal budget, even though no constitutional provision requires that this tax policy continue? The rhetoric of tax exemption is philosophical, appealing to notions of appropriate intergovernmental relations and, in particular, to the doctrine of reciprocal immunity: no level of government should use its taxing authority to impose harm on another level. ; But the true force behind tax exemption is that it provides states and local governments with a valuable subsidy, which can be enjoyed at their discretion. This article identifies the problems posed by tax exemption, and assesses some alternatives. It asks whether the results of tax exemption represent an appropriate outcome, and questions whether tax exemption is really necessary to achieve the benefits stated in its favor.

Keywords: Municipal; bonds (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1992
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.bostonfed.org/economic/neer/neer1992/neer392d.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedbne:y:1992:i:may:p:47-64

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in New England Economic Review from Federal Reserve Bank of Boston Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Spozio ().