Why we don't know whether money causes output

Charles Carlstrom and Edward N. Gamber

Economic Review, 1989, vol. 25, issue Q III, 27-39

Abstract: An examination of the commonly accepted positive correlation between money and real output, including a review of several models of business cycles and an explanation of how money can be neutral and yet still appear to affect real output.

Date: 1989
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.clevelandfed.org/research/review/1989/89-q3-carlstrom.pdf (text/html)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (http://www.clevelandfed.org/research/review/1989/89-q3-carlstrom.pdf [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.clevelandfed.org/research/review/1989/89-q3-carlstrom.pdf)
https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/scribd/?toc_id=27822 ... _page=29#scribd-open

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedcer:y:1989:i:qiii:p:27-39:n:v.25no.3

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Economic Review from Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by 4D Library ().