The long-run effects of a permanent change in defense purchases

Mark Wynne

Economic and Financial Policy Review, 1991, issue Jan, 16 pages

Abstract: In this article, Mark A. Wynne explores how a permanent reduction in defense spending might affect the average U.S. household. He finds that, in the long run, Americans will reap a peace dividend. For example, if Congress reduces annual defense spending from 6 percent of gross national product to 3 percent, in the long run private consumption as a share of GNP could rise 3 percentage points. In the short run, some businesses and households will sustain losses. Over time, however, the economy will reabsorb the resources freed by lower defense-related production and will expand production for private consumption. ; Underlying Wynne's analysis is the assumption that Congress will use the funds saved on defense spending either to lower taxes or to reduce the federal deficit. Wynne develops a simple empirical model to explain the relationship between the share of GNP spent on private consumption and the share spent on defense over the past one hundred years.

Keywords: Defense contracts; Expenditures, Public (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1991
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedder:y:1991:i:jan:p:1-16

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Economic and Financial Policy Review from Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Amy Chapman ().