 The Goldilocks Problem: How to get Incentives and Default Waterfalls “Just Right”Rebecca Lewis and John McPartland Economic Perspectives, 2017, issue 1, 1-13 Abstract: Regulatory reforms in the wake of the 2007?08 financial crisis have increased the focus on the systemic importance of central counterparties (CCPs), which guarantee the performance of their clearing members? financial contracts.1 This, in turn, has increased policymakers? and practitioners? focus on risk management at CCPs. A key component of any CCP?s risk-management strategy is the CCP?s default waterfall. The default waterfall stipulates the sequence of financial resources that a CCP can draw upon to cover the unsatisfied financial obligations of a defaulted clearing member. At the top of the waterfall are the margin and default fund contributions of the defaulting clearing member.The remainder of the waterfall comprises contributions from the CCP, known as skin-in-the-game, and contributions from clearing members. This article describes how the structure for these CCP- and member-funded tranches affects how the interests of CCPs, clearing members, and their prudential regulators are aligned. Keywords: Central counterparty (CCP); clearinghouses; tranche (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedhep:00023 Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from Access Statistics for this article More articles in Economic Perspectives from Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Contact information at EDIRC. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.