EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

A comparison of U.S. corporate and bank insolvency resolution

Robert R. Bliss and George G. Kaufman

Economic Perspectives, 2006, vol. 30, issue Q II, 44-55

Abstract: In the U.S., the insolvency resolution of most corporations is governed by the federal bankruptcy code and is administered by special bankruptcy courts. Most large corporate bankruptcies are resolved under Chapter 11 reorganization proceedings. However, commercial bank insolvencies are governed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Act and are administered by the FDIC. These two resolution processes?corporate bankruptcy and bank receiverships?differ in a number of significant ways, including the type of proceeding (judicial versus administrative); the rights of managers, stockholders, and creditors in the proceedings; the explicit and implicit goals of the resolution; the prioritization of creditors? claims; the costs of administration; and the timeliness of creditor payments. This article elucidates these differences and explores the effectiveness of the procedural differences in achieving the stated goals.

Keywords: Bankruptcy; Bank failures (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2006
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.chicagofed.org/digital_assets/publicati ... t4_bliss_kaufman.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedhep:y:2006:i:qii:p:44-55:n:v.30no.2

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Economic Perspectives from Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Lauren Wiese ().

 
Page updated 2025-04-17
Handle: RePEc:fip:fedhep:y:2006:i:qii:p:44-55:n:v.30no.2