EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

How Well Does Agency Theory Explain Executive Compensation?

George-Levi Gayle (), Li Chen () and Robert A. Miller
Additional contact information
Robert A. Miller: Tepper School of Business, Carnegie Mellon University

Review, 2018, vol. 100, issue 3, 36 pages

Abstract: As the share of all income going to the top 1 percent has risen over the past four decades, so has the share of top incomes coming from labor income relative to capital income. The rise in labor income is mainly due to the explosion in executive compensation over the same period—mostly because of the increase in executives being paid with stocks, options, and bonuses. The principal-agent model explains the reason for such compensation instead of a flat salary. Yet hundreds of papers in economics, finance, accounting, and management have reached no consensus on whether executive compensation is efficient or whether empirically it conforms to the prediction of the principal-agent theory. In this article, we argue that this lack of consensus is due to two issues: The first is a measurement issue, and the second is that the exact prediction of the principal-agent model depends on many objects unobservable to the econometrician. We illustrate how using theory-based estimation together with a model-motivated measure of total compensation can help overcome these issues. Finally, using a model-consistent measure of compensation and theory-based estimation, we conclude that executive compensation broadly conforms to the principal-agent theory; however, each situation and the variables used have to be carefully modeled, identified, and estimated.

JEL-codes: D82 L25 M12 M52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
https://files.stlouisfed.org/files/htdocs/publicat ... ive-compensation.pdf Full text (application/pdf)
https://doi.org/10.20955/r.100.201-36 https://doi.org/10.20955/r.100.201-36 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedlrv:00103

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://files.stloui ... htdocs/publications/

DOI: 10.20955/r.100.201-36

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Review from Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Anna Oates ().

 
Page updated 2019-10-12
Handle: RePEc:fip:fedlrv:00103