Money and inflation in colonial Massachusetts

Bruce Smith

Quarterly Review, 1984, vol. 8, issue Win

Abstract: This article argues that the quantity theory of money is not supported by the evidence. Contrary to the quantity theory, the article says, the value of money depends primarily on how carefully it is backed. That is, the rate of inflation depends more on underlying fiscal policies than on rates of money growth. The evidence for this argument comes from a close look at the way in which the colony of Massachusetts ended a severe long-term inflation in 1750. Other British North American colonies endured similar episodes, all of which parallel some periods of severe inflation in the 20th century United States. The 18th century evidence thus contains lessons for modern monetary policy. ; Reprinted in Quarterly Review, Fall 2002 (v. 26, no. 4)

Keywords: Money theory; Economic history (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1984
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (18)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.minneapolisfed.org/research/common/pub_detail.cfm?pb_autonum_id=167 (application/pdf)
http://www.minneapolisfed.org/research/QR/QR811.pdf

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedmqr:y:1984:i:win:n:v.8no.1

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Quarterly Review from Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kate Hansel ().